Hello, and welcome to your weekly dose of actionable (and occasionally provocative) things.
Apparently, I need a fig tree now.
Our friends went away for two weeks, and we agreed to take care of their pets.
Before they left, they also told us to “abuse the fig tree.” It is peak season, and anything we do not pick will rot.
This was irresponsible information to give me.
Until last week, I thought sweet cherries were my number one fruit obsession. It turns out I had simply never been given unrestricted access to a fig tree.
One week later, I have already picked a spot for one in our yard.
All we agreed to do was feed the pets…
I hate when people do this to me!
Enjoy the edition!
Table of Contents
Better Than Scrolling
Three new things to try this week. One is enough.
Last week’s challenge report:
Clear one surface before going to bed - the easiest one, and surprisingly satisfying. Obviously, I organized my desk. I even put the pens in the pen holder. I’m still not convinced this counts as a challenge.
Learn the name of one local tree - I got lucky with this one because I picked the lavender-purple tree blooming in front of my house. I’m not sure if it counts as a tree, but my rules, my definitions. I fed the image to GPT. Myrtle! How will I remember it? We vacationed in Myrtle Beach once.
Sit near it for ten minutes - iI don’t know why I wanted to sit near a tree in the first place. Anyway, close enough. I stood near it three times for about 15 minutes each, contemplating whether my lawn was growing fast enough.
My picks for next week:
Make a pot of tea and sit down long enough to finish it.
Learn one fact that sounds false but is true.
Tell it to someone. (this is me gently preparing my lovely wife here for whatever nonsense I learn next week)
Report in a week.
Heads-up: If you’re reading this in Gmail (either in the browser or the app), you might not see the full content. Since our emails are packed with rich content, Gmail loves to clip them. You’ll see a small note at the bottom that says [Message clipped] View entire message. Just click that link - the rest of the content is waiting for you on our website.
Learn From My Mistakes
Short story of how I break life chaos into small, solvable problems - 3 min read.

Nobody buys expensive things for status anymore.
That would be embarrassing.
Now we buy them for quality.
For craftsmanship.
For focus.
For hydration.
Every expensive object comes with a respectable explanation.
The Rolex is for telling time - about $5 per glance.
The $4,500 La Marzocco Linea Micra, plus the grinder it apparently requires, is for saving money on coffee at home.. Somehow.
The Moleskine notebook is for writing more, not for sitting untouched on a desk looking expensive.
The Yeti bottle is for drinking more water.
The Herman Miller chair is for posture (although at $1,800 I also expect personal growth).
The Crate & Barrel oak table is for “the space” (phrase that has never made anything cheaper).
Sure.
These things are useful.
They also make us feel better about the person we are trying to become.
A premium notebook says I take writing seriously.
Minimalist furniture says my house is calm, organized and... modern!
A very expensive chair says I care about my back. It says nothing about how I actually sit.
I get it because I am highly susceptible to this nonsense.
Full disclosure for anyone new here who has not yet learned how much sarcasm I use: I do not own any of these things. Yet…
But put a well-made object in front of me and I immediately imagine a better version of myself.
Calmer.
Sharper.
More organized. (The kind of person who has a drawer in a kitchen that opens without resistance!)
The object is never just the object.
But that does not make the purchase fake or stupid.
Sometimes you use it every day.
Sometimes it genuinely improves your life.
And sometimes you simply love it.
Ramit Sethi has a good rule for this: spend extravagantly on the things you love, and cut costs mercilessly on the things you do not.
The problem is that my “I LOVEEEE this” and my wife’s “No, this is clutter” are often about the same thing.
In our house, she has been very helpful in deciding what we love.
Looking back at 2025, we had no trouble spending money on a couple of “family” vacations.
“My family” went away and had a great time. I stayed home with my wife’s beloved Yorkie. Yorkies are essential in every household. At least, that is what she has persuaded me to believe.
We also decided it was important to replace our $30 AeroPress with an espresso machine (I am embarrassed to admit this).
This made perfect sense if you ignored the fact that I drink about two liters of green tea every day.
La Marzocco?
She wishes.
I sleep well knowing she has not researched that one yet (Ha, honey. We already have an espresso machine. Too late now. I hope… Be mercy?).
The things we apparently did not love were a sauna, a cold plunge, or doing anything useful to the backyard (I am still surprised the front-yard curbing made it through the approval process. Apparently, looking good to the neighbors counts as something we love).
Glad to see our money went exactly where it mattered.
And at exactly the right time.
The espresso machine arrived around the same time two of my wife’s best friends bought one.
The official position is that nobody influenced anybody.
So no, we do not buy expensive things to impress people.
We buy them because they fit the person we think we are becoming.
Or, in our case, the person my wife’s friends became about three weeks earlier.
The good news is that we are done buying expensive things now.
Right, honey?
If there is no newsletter next week, she read this far.
Hopefully, till next time.
P.S. All characters are fictional, and any resemblance to actual people in my household is purely coincidental. That is the official position.

The Curious Procrastinator relies on word of mouth!
If you’re enjoying our newsletter, please help us reach more readers by forwarding this letter to a friend.

Our favorite digital finds
Tools, apps, and services that actually deliver
Useful for discovering that two people you assumed lived in completely different eras actually overlapped. Lincoln and Darwin sharing a birthday is exactly the kind of fact it keeps finding.
For passwords, access codes, or anything else someone only needs to see once. The note disappears after it is opened.
I’m quite good at noticing my bad habits, but Unloop turns patterns like procrastination, overthinking, or endless scrolling into a visual map.
Short & Sweet
Short articles worth your attention
Solitude Is a Skill - 9 min read.
Solitude is not loneliness. It is also not watching seven episodes because you “needed to decompress.” This article explains how to spend time alone without wasting it.
A Few Stories About Big Decisions - 5 min read.
Eight short stories about decisions that seemed strange, unpopular, or irrational at the time. Yup, all of them worked.
Time Confetti and the Broken Promise of Leisure - 6 min read.
Ever finish an evening with no idea where it went? This article explains “time confetti”: the tiny interruptions that make an hour off feel like you never stopped working. Now that I know the term, I notice it everywhere.
Add this to your shelf
If you're looking for something to read, this book's worth considering
Ken helped create some of the original iPhone’s most familiar features. The book shows how great products were actually made: constant demos, blunt feedback, and many great ideas killed before lunch. In case you do not remember, the first version of iOS did not have a copy-paste feature! Steve Jobs liked to say “no” a lot more often than “yes”.
A Workspace I Envy
A handpicked desk setup that caught my eye this week

Sometimes, this is enough. Very often it’s more than enough.
Behind the Persona
A deep dive into the quirks, habits, and backstories that shape icons
Before researching Michael Ovitz, I thought Hollywood agents mostly made phone calls, wore expensive suits, and somehow got invited to better lunches than the rest of us. Ovitz went from a William Morris trainee to co-founding CAA, which became one of Hollywood’s most influential talent agencies. He represented major actors and directors, helped change how films were assembled and sold, and became known for intense preparation, constant follow-up, and unusual attention to detail.

Cool Facts About Michael Ovitz
Ask to Be Tested: When Michael Ovitz applied to William Morris, one of Hollywood’s biggest talent agencies, he was told its training program took three years and had a waiting list. He proposed a deal: give him three months to learn the business, and if he failed, he would repay everything they had paid him during that time. He just gave them a low-risk way to test it.
Study the Boss’s Schedule: Sam Weisbord, the president of William Morris, often returned after dinner to work through his mail. Ovitz noticed, stayed late, answered calls, and organized what Weisbord needed. At 22, he became Weisbord’s assistant. Within six months, he was an agent.
Competitive Habit Check: As a trainee, Ovitz kept useful research to himself because the other trainees were his competition. When he later co-founded CAA, he reversed the rule and pushed employees to share information. What helped him get ahead alone would have caused problems inside his own company.
Shared-Client Rule: At most agencies, one agent controlled the client relationship. CAA sometimes assigned three, four, or five agents to the same important client. Ovitz wanted clients connected to the company, not dependent on one person who might eventually leave.
Proof-of-Receipt Rule: CAA agents passed around paper notes called buck slips. The recipient had to mark the note, answer it, and send it back. Until then, the update was not complete. “I sent it” was not accepted as proof that communication had happened.
Scan First, Read Sunday: Ovitz subscribed to 210 magazines, but he did not read each one from beginning to end. He scanned headlines, images, and opening paragraphs, pulled out the useful pieces, and saved them for Sunday.
Cash-Flow Order: CAA began with television instead of film because television clients were paid every Thursday. That gave the new agency regular commission income. The founders cleared about $100,000 in debt within six months and waited until 1978 to put serious effort into movies. Logic + math = winning combo.
Second-Look Test: Ovitz says he reviews about 200 artwork images a day. When one interests him, he saves it and looks again several days later. The second viewing tells him whether the interest lasted or it was something in the moment and therefore irrelevant for most people.
Capture Now, Research Later: When Ovitz finds something interesting through Instagram, Google, Perplexity, or another source, he prints it and adds it to a research pile. He investigates selected items later, usually at night. The question gets saved without taking over whatever he was already doing.
Watch-worthy clips
One video that got us thinking, and we think you'll like it too
A memory can feel completely accurate and still be wrong. This clip explains how your brain stores experiences, then changes them each time you remember.
Enjoying the newsletter? Please forward this issue to a friend who might enjoy it too 😊🙏🏻
It only takes 10 seconds. Making this one took us 9 hours…
If you are new here, what are you waiting for? ⬇️

